Difference between revisions of "Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Pornopedia/2010-May porn purge"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday December 25, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
*[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/7711486/Wikipedia-porn-row-sees-founder-give-up-his-editing-privileges.html Wikipedia-porn-row-sees-founder-give-up-his-editing-privileges] Daily Telegraph 11 May
 
*[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/7711486/Wikipedia-porn-row-sees-founder-give-up-his-editing-privileges.html Wikipedia-porn-row-sees-founder-give-up-his-editing-privileges] Daily Telegraph 11 May
 
*[http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1635810/wikipedia-roiled-porn-row Wikipedia roiled by porn row] The Inquirer 11 May
 
*[http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1635810/wikipedia-roiled-porn-row Wikipedia roiled by porn row] The Inquirer 11 May
 +
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:News_regarding_the_sexual_content_purge Commons:News regarding the sexual content purge]
  
 
==Wales' purge==
 
==Wales' purge==
 +
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=Jimbo+Wales&page=&year=&month=-1&tagfilter= Wales' deletion log]. A red link indicates a deletion that stuck.  A blue link indicates subsequent restoration.
  
 
==Restored material==
 
==Restored material==
 
+
*[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/96/Martin_Van_Maele_-_La_Grande_Danse_macabre_des_vifs_-_29.jpg Incest pedophile drawing]
 +
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Female_bottomlessness_in_photography Female bottomless]
 +
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Upskirt 'Up skirt']
 
==Material that was always there==
 
==Material that was always there==
  
 
* [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:List_of_genitalia_for_review List of genitalia]
 
* [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:List_of_genitalia_for_review List of genitalia]
 +
*[http://webcitation.org/query.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcommons.wikimedia.org%2Fwiki%2FFile%3ALolimanga.JPG Wikipedia editor's child porn collection] (now deleted).
 +
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Bad_image_list Bad images]
 +
*[[Worst_of_Wikipedia#Revolting]]
  
 
==Debates on the Commons and Meta-wiki==
 
==Debates on the Commons and Meta-wiki==
Line 33: Line 40:
 
*[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-November/thread.html#56236 Hand wringing over whether they should be welcome]
 
*[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-November/thread.html#56236 Hand wringing over whether they should be welcome]
 
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive132#Self_identified_underage_user Should 6 year olds be allowed to edit?]
 
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive132#Self_identified_underage_user Should 6 year olds be allowed to edit?]
 +
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DGG Public librarian] user DGG [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058234.html says] "There is no general agreement here that any system of filtering for any purpose is ever necessary, and I think it is totally contrary to the entire general idea behind the the free culture movement.
 +
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)&oldid=360967824#Re-upload_Commons_artwork_that.27s_been_deleted_by_Jimbo_Wales Village pump discussion]
 +
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&oldid=39105308#I_have_responded Don't think about the children]
 +
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump&oldid=39121435#Sexual_content More discussion at the 'Village pump']
 +
 
== Wales attacked by the community==
 
== Wales attacked by the community==
 +
*[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Remove_Founder_flag Remove founder flag]
 +
*[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Petition_to_Jimbo Petition to Wales]
  
 
==Reaction of Wikimedia foundation==
 
==Reaction of Wikimedia foundation==
 +
 +
 +
*[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058091.html Wales admits deletions to foundation]
 +
** [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058092.html I'm sorry I acted with such urgency]
 +
* [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaannounce-l/2010-May/000008.html Statement by Michael Snow]
 +
*[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/057800.html Statement by Sydney Poore] "I support the clean up effort by Jimmy and the administrators on Commons for the images that have no significant educational value. I also understand that to some editors who are new to thinking about the issue that this may seem abrupt. So, I encourage good communication between all the stakeholders so that we can understand each others concerns and address them."
 +
 +
==Reaction of 'Victim of Censorship'==
 +
 +
Wise words from a respected contributor to Wikipedia Review [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=29506&view=findpost&p=236129].
 +
 +
:No school, with children, should be allowed to have ANY access to Wikipedia. School boards and library boards should consider Wikipedia to be pornographic website catering to pedophiles, and Namblers, and as such, has a reputation for its lack of control, governance and responsibility to its patrons. Wikipedia should be banned from any respectable institution of learning.

Latest revision as of 15:13, 13 May 2010

News coverage

Wales' purge

  • Wales' deletion log. A red link indicates a deletion that stuck. A blue link indicates subsequent restoration.

Restored material

Material that was always there

Debates on the Commons and Meta-wiki

Wikipedia culture

Evidence that the political culture of Wikipedia is deeply hostile to getting rid of porn.

Wales attacked by the community

Reaction of Wikimedia foundation

Reaction of 'Victim of Censorship'

Wise words from a respected contributor to Wikipedia Review [1].

No school, with children, should be allowed to have ANY access to Wikipedia. School boards and library boards should consider Wikipedia to be pornographic website catering to pedophiles, and Namblers, and as such, has a reputation for its lack of control, governance and responsibility to its patrons. Wikipedia should be banned from any respectable institution of learning.