Difference between revisions of "Directory:Jon Awbrey/Poetry/Questionable Verses"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday November 13, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchJon Awbrey (talk | contribs) (cleanup) |
Jon Awbrey (talk | contribs) (reformat) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Questionable Verses}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:Questionable Verses}} | ||
− | < | + | |
− | + | ==Ethos Anthropoi Daimon== | |
− | + | ||
+ | <pre> | ||
deeming done dun a man doom | deeming done dun a man doom | ||
a man's manner is'm demoon | a man's manner is'm demoon | ||
Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
scribed in a volume of magritte plates | scribed in a volume of magritte plates | ||
for sue on her birthday 1980 with love | for sue on her birthday 1980 with love | ||
− | < | + | </pre> |
− | + | ==Cassandroid Anxieties Revisited== | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <pre> | |
And the Ire came over Cassandra, | And the Ire came over Cassandra, | ||
And Cassandra went out the City, | And Cassandra went out the City, | ||
Line 70: | Line 71: | ||
Jon Awbrey | Jon Awbrey | ||
21 Nov 2000 | 21 Nov 2000 | ||
− | < | + | </pre> |
− | < | + | ==Peerage== |
− | + | ||
− | + | <pre> | |
there's no presumption in peer, | there's no presumption in peer, | ||
much less peremptory emptiness, | much less peremptory emptiness, | ||
Line 85: | Line 86: | ||
thus spake 0* | thus spake 0* | ||
10 Dec 2005 | 10 Dec 2005 | ||
− | < | + | </pre> |
+ | |||
+ | ==For the Master of the Games on His Birthday== | ||
− | < | + | <pre> |
− | |||
− | |||
Do we feign understanding of what underlies, | Do we feign understanding of what underlies, | ||
And so become victim to the figmentations | And so become victim to the figmentations | ||
Line 100: | Line 101: | ||
— Jon Awbrey, 16 December 2007 | — Jon Awbrey, 16 December 2007 | ||
− | < | + | </pre> |
<br><sharethis /> | <br><sharethis /> | ||
[[Category:Poetry]] | [[Category:Poetry]] |
Revision as of 16:04, 9 June 2011
Ethos Anthropoi Daimon
deeming done dun a man doom a man's manner is'm demoon a man's cant is his dome : a woman's master in that enchanted domain where conscience is the demon , and the code of his duel is decrypted with a ringing in the ears and a tire iron coming from the corner of an eye . a man's manner is'm demoon deeming done din a man doom jon awbrey scribed in a volume of magritte plates for sue on her birthday 1980 with love
Cassandroid Anxieties Revisited
And the Ire came over Cassandra, And Cassandra went out the City, And Cassandra came to that Rock, And thus spake the Rock, I hear: And why are you thus speaking to a Rock, It says, And when the State of your City is Dire, It says, And it is Just your Monu-Mental Agility, She says, And it is Just your Ex-Orbital Capacity, She says, And should you not Ride Over Our Moment, It says, And should you not Ventilate Our Hyphen, It says, And should you Muse Over Our Reflection, She says, And Imp Etat "I Travail" As "A Trivial", She says, And after that they settled down a Bit, I hear, And after that they counted more Amens, I hear, And the Rock will be open to criticism, She says, And the Rock may reflect on its moment, She says, And still the Men of the City will vie, It says, And still the Men of the City will die, It says, And they are Persians all, so they say, She says, And they are wary of Geeks' boring GIF, She says, And still the Men of the City will lie, It says, And still the Men of the City will lie, It says, And all of that Need need come to pass, She says, And must pass muster to bear Invention, She says, And the Rock will be open to criticism, It says, And the Rock may reflect on its moment, It says, And that is just Men, the Sphinx knows, She says, And that is just Ending-Where-He-Begat, It says, And that is all there is to say, or so, I hear. Jon Awbrey 21 Nov 2000
Peerage
there's no presumption in peer, much less peremptory emptiness, to whom can crack a dictionary. but who presumes to umpireship, is a nonpeer captain of umpiry. crack this code, crack a smile, and put the e bak in crackpoet. thus spake 0* 10 Dec 2005
For the Master of the Games on His Birthday
Do we feign understanding of what underlies, And so become victim to the figmentations That the mind posts up to the lintels of sense? Or do we but array the Data Of The Senses Along the lines that they themselves suggest? Then again, on third thought, what's the diff? — Jon Awbrey, 16 December 2007
<sharethis />