Difference between revisions of "User talk:Deloitte"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday December 26, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
Reply:
 
Reply:
  
One does not adopt a role by being the target of harassment - in that case the role is foisted upon you and I never made a public accusation here, nor did I ever accept your role as a mediator. You have attempted to insert yourself in this situation for an unknown reason. Given the fact that a) you have persistently posted emails without permission and despite being asked not to thus destroying my capacity to trust you and thus destroying your ability to act as a mediator  b) you are now falsely claiming that I asked for you to "investigate" anything and falsely claimed that I initiated contact with you when the opposite is true c) you falsely claim that I have made a "public accusation" I'm afraid that I lack confidence in your abilities, have no trust in your ability to either be neutral or assess evidence (how can I trust someone to intrepret evidence when they fabricate claims such as the two above) and reject your self-appointed role as a mediator. [[User:Deloitte|Deloitte]] 16:00, 26 October 2008 (PDT)
+
One does not adopt a role by being the target of harassment - in that case the role is foisted upon you and I never made a public accusation here, nor did I ever accept your role as a mediator. You have attempted to insert yourself in this situation for an unknown reason. Given the fact that a) you have persistently posted emails without permission and despite being asked not to thus destroying my capacity to trust you and thus destroying your ability to act as a mediator  b) you are now falsely claiming that I asked for you to "investigate" anything and falsely claimed that I initiated contact with you when the opposite is true c) you falsely claim that I have made a "public accusation" I'm afraid that I lack confidence in your abilities, have no trust in your capacity to either be neutral or assess evidence (how can I trust someone to intrepret evidence when they fabricate claims such as the two above) and reject your self-appointed role as a mediator. Indeed, given that you were banned from wikipedia indefinitely for engaging in "outing" of editors I think that if anything you're in a conflict of interest here given that it is "outing" that is the issue in question. [[User:Deloitte|Deloitte]] 16:00, 26 October 2008 (PDT)

Revision as of 23:24, 26 October 2008

Welcome!


Hi Deloitte, welcome to MyWikiBiz. We're happy that you've taken the steps to become a member of our site. MyWikiBiz is a directory where any person, any company, any product, or any thing can author their own legacy. We seek to provide the space for 265 million entities. Our registered editors like you have generated over 60,000 pages so far -- help keep that number growing with an article about yourself, your business, your industry, your favorite product, hobby, or organization. Since 2008, MyWikiBiz.com has served up over 1 million page views. Get started authoring your legacy today!

Helpful tips

Here are some tips on how to create a Directory listing and take advantage of the semantic web features we have in place:

  • You may write as an opinionated advocate in the Directory -- neutral view is not required. You can sell products, promote videos, upload documents, even host your own Google AdSense ads. This auto-fill form will guide you through creating a very basic directory listing right now.
  • Because MyWikiBiz supports Semantic Web technology, search engine results are highly optimized. Internal searches can also be performed that wouldn't be possible on Google, MySpace, or Wikipedia.

A few favorite pages that might help acquaint a new user with the possibilities are found among the Demonstration links, or in these articles written by independent reviewers.

E-mail updates

If you would like a daily e-mail notice of what has been created or updated on MyWikiBiz.com, just complete this form. <embed>

<form style="border:1px solid #ccc;padding:3px;text-align:center;" action="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverify" method="post" target="popupwindow" onsubmit="window.open('http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=2001427', 'popupwindow', 'scrollbars=yes,width=550,height=520');return true">

Enter your email address:

<input type="text" style="width:140px" name="email"/>

<input type="hidden" value="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~e?ffid=2001427" name="url"/><input type="hidden" value="MyWikiBiz" name="title"/><input type="hidden" name="loc" value="en_US"/><input type="submit" value="Subscribe" />

Delivered by <a href="http://www.feedburner.com" target="_blank">FeedBurner</a>

</form>

</embed>

Share this page!

<sharethis />

Moulton wrote:

Please understand that if you contact me to ask me to investigate some aspect of online culture, I am going to interpret that to mean you are asking for a scientific review of the cultural phenomenon that you are raising to my attention.

Reply:

I never initated contact with you or nor have I ever asked you to investigate anything. You contacted me and demanded an explanation of my redaction[1] and I sent you a reply via email which you then gracelessly posted.

Moulton wrote:

It's too late for you to avoid the role you adopted, as both a recipient of a public accusation and as a publisher of an accusation. Each side must now produce evidence, analysis, and reasoning to support their respective theses, and demonstrate how they have attempted to falsify each hypothesis on the table.

Reply:

One does not adopt a role by being the target of harassment - in that case the role is foisted upon you and I never made a public accusation here, nor did I ever accept your role as a mediator. You have attempted to insert yourself in this situation for an unknown reason. Given the fact that a) you have persistently posted emails without permission and despite being asked not to thus destroying my capacity to trust you and thus destroying your ability to act as a mediator b) you are now falsely claiming that I asked for you to "investigate" anything and falsely claimed that I initiated contact with you when the opposite is true c) you falsely claim that I have made a "public accusation" I'm afraid that I lack confidence in your abilities, have no trust in your capacity to either be neutral or assess evidence (how can I trust someone to intrepret evidence when they fabricate claims such as the two above) and reject your self-appointed role as a mediator. Indeed, given that you were banned from wikipedia indefinitely for engaging in "outing" of editors I think that if anything you're in a conflict of interest here given that it is "outing" that is the issue in question. Deloitte 16:00, 26 October 2008 (PDT)