|
|
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <div class="nonumtoc">__TOC__</div> | | <div class="nonumtoc">__TOC__</div> |
| + | |
| + | ==Discussion== |
| | | |
| ==Work Area== | | ==Work Area== |
− |
| |
− | ===1.3.===
| |
− |
| |
− | ====1.3.5. Discussion of Formalization : Specific Objects====
| |
− |
| |
− | <pre>
| |
− | I recognize inquiry as beginning with a "surprising phenomenon" or
| |
− | a "problematic situation", more briefly described as a "surprise"
| |
− | or a "problem", respectively. These are the types of moments that
| |
− | try our souls, the instances of events that instigate inquiry as
| |
− | an effort to achieve their own resolution. Surprises and problems
| |
− | are experienced as afflicted with an irritating uncertainty or a
| |
− | compelling difficulty, one that calls for a response on the part
| |
− | of the agent in question:
| |
− |
| |
− | 1. A "surprise" calls for an explanation to resolve the
| |
− | uncertainty that is present in it. This uncertainty
| |
− | is associated with a difference between observations
| |
− | and expectations.
| |
− |
| |
− | 2. A "problem" calls for a plan of action to resolve the
| |
− | difficulty that is present in it. This difficulty is
| |
− | associated with a difference between observations and
| |
− | intentions.
| |
− |
| |
− | To express this diversity in a unified formula: Both types of inquiry
| |
− | begin with a "delta", a compact term that admits of expansion as a debt,
| |
− | a difference, a difficulty, a discrepancy, a dispersion, a distribution,
| |
− | a doubt, a duplicity, or a duty.
| |
− |
| |
− | Expressed another way, inquiry begins with a doubt about one's object,
| |
− | whether this means what is true of a case, an object, or a world, what
| |
− | to do about reaching a goal, or whether the hoped-for goal is really
| |
− | good for oneself -- with all that these questions lead to in essence,
| |
− | in deed, or in fact.
| |
− |
| |
− | Perhaps there is an inexhaustible reality that issues in these
| |
− | apparent mysteries and recurrent crises, but, by the time I say
| |
− | this much, I am already indulging in a finite image, a hypothesis
| |
− | about what is going on. If nothing else, then, one finds again the
| |
− | familiar pattern, where the formative relation between the informal
| |
− | and the formal merely serves to remind one anew of the relationship
| |
− | between the infinite and the finite.
| |
− | </pre>
| |