Difference between revisions of "User talk:Joehazelton"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday November 14, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Welcome to Centiare!)
 
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Greeting}}
 
{{Greeting}}
 +
 +
==respectable copy==
 +
It seems that you're incapable of creating respectable copy. Prove me wrong. Give me one paragraph which isn't full of swear words and random personal attacks.[[User:Proabivouac|Proabivouac]] 02:42, 11 October 2008 (PDT)
 +
:He already has, Proab:  ''The problem is meely-mouth, double talkers, dismiss this, in favor of moral relativism, where every person is a god and no one is bound to "higher moral authority" so evolves a culture of elitism and ends justified the means and a cesspool like wikipeida (where, as in Orwell, black is white, and 1+2=4 and where consensus can generate justification for the lies and bullshit for the sake of "consensus" and "harmony" but in the end, you get a Tyranny of the Majority and the evil you get with it.''  Let's stay focused on the DESIGN of a new criticism site, and not hold to the '''future''' standards those who are participating in the '''current''' brainstorming.  Thanks!  -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 05:51, 11 October 2008 (PDT)
 +
 +
== Are you Joseph100? ==
 +
 +
If so, your stuff was great.  WR made a big mistake in banning you.  A lot of the regulars still bring up your name now and then. [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 21:31, 11 October 2008 (PDT)
 +
 +
JH: YES
 +
 +
Yes, I would imagine they would.  My ideas  were always based on cold logic and fundamentally fairness... the problem is there was those who tried to bend the truth (The wikipedidiots on WR that bullied WR to BAN ME) to fit one persons ideas of right and wrong the only problem is truth can not be bent, and I was the messages which pointed it out so it made for an uncomfortable situation of them being shown to be liars and hypocrites by there'd very words and deeds.  I would think that would made them very angry and it did and they banned me, as the hypocrites they were, to say out of one side...WE BELIEVE IN FREE SPEECH... and THEN WHACK PEOPLE WITH THE BAN HAMMER FOR HAVING A DIFFERING POINT OF VIEW.  Thats what was at issue.[[User:Joehazelton|Joehazelton]] 16:32, 12 October 2008 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 23:48, 12 October 2008

Welcome!


Hi Joehazelton, welcome to MyWikiBiz. We're happy that you've taken the steps to become a member of our site. MyWikiBiz is a directory where any person, any company, any product, or any thing can author their own legacy. We seek to provide the space for 265 million entities. Our registered editors like you have generated over 60,000 pages so far -- help keep that number growing with an article about yourself, your business, your industry, your favorite product, hobby, or organization. Since 2008, MyWikiBiz.com has served up over 1 million page views. Get started authoring your legacy today!

Helpful tips

Here are some tips on how to create a Directory listing and take advantage of the semantic web features we have in place:

  • You may write as an opinionated advocate in the Directory -- neutral view is not required. You can sell products, promote videos, upload documents, even host your own Google AdSense ads. This auto-fill form will guide you through creating a very basic directory listing right now.
  • Because MyWikiBiz supports Semantic Web technology, search engine results are highly optimized. Internal searches can also be performed that wouldn't be possible on Google, MySpace, or Wikipedia.

A few favorite pages that might help acquaint a new user with the possibilities are found among the Demonstration links, or in these articles written by independent reviewers.

E-mail updates

If you would like a daily e-mail notice of what has been created or updated on MyWikiBiz.com, just complete this form. <embed>

<form style="border:1px solid #ccc;padding:3px;text-align:center;" action="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverify" method="post" target="popupwindow" onsubmit="window.open('http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=2001427', 'popupwindow', 'scrollbars=yes,width=550,height=520');return true">

Enter your email address:

<input type="text" style="width:140px" name="email"/>

<input type="hidden" value="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~e?ffid=2001427" name="url"/><input type="hidden" value="MyWikiBiz" name="title"/><input type="hidden" name="loc" value="en_US"/><input type="submit" value="Subscribe" />

Delivered by <a href="http://www.feedburner.com" target="_blank">FeedBurner</a>

</form>

</embed>

Share this page!

<sharethis />

respectable copy

It seems that you're incapable of creating respectable copy. Prove me wrong. Give me one paragraph which isn't full of swear words and random personal attacks.Proabivouac 02:42, 11 October 2008 (PDT)

He already has, Proab: The problem is meely-mouth, double talkers, dismiss this, in favor of moral relativism, where every person is a god and no one is bound to "higher moral authority" so evolves a culture of elitism and ends justified the means and a cesspool like wikipeida (where, as in Orwell, black is white, and 1+2=4 and where consensus can generate justification for the lies and bullshit for the sake of "consensus" and "harmony" but in the end, you get a Tyranny of the Majority and the evil you get with it. Let's stay focused on the DESIGN of a new criticism site, and not hold to the future standards those who are participating in the current brainstorming. Thanks! -- MyWikiBiz 05:51, 11 October 2008 (PDT)

Are you Joseph100?

If so, your stuff was great. WR made a big mistake in banning you. A lot of the regulars still bring up your name now and then. Emperor 21:31, 11 October 2008 (PDT)

JH: YES

Yes, I would imagine they would. My ideas were always based on cold logic and fundamentally fairness... the problem is there was those who tried to bend the truth (The wikipedidiots on WR that bullied WR to BAN ME) to fit one persons ideas of right and wrong the only problem is truth can not be bent, and I was the messages which pointed it out so it made for an uncomfortable situation of them being shown to be liars and hypocrites by there'd very words and deeds. I would think that would made them very angry and it did and they banned me, as the hypocrites they were, to say out of one side...WE BELIEVE IN FREE SPEECH... and THEN WHACK PEOPLE WITH THE BAN HAMMER FOR HAVING A DIFFERING POINT OF VIEW. Thats what was at issue.Joehazelton 16:32, 12 October 2008 (PDT)