Difference between revisions of "Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Pornopedia/2010-May porn purge"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday December 26, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 1: | Line 1: | ||
==News coverage== | ==News coverage== | ||
+ | *[http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/05/07/wikipedia-purges-porn/ Wikipedia purges porn] Fox news 7 May | ||
+ | *[http://www.siliconrepublic.com/news/article/16145/digital-life/wikimedia-dumps-pornography Wikimedia dumps porn following FoxNews probe] Silicon Republic 10 May | ||
+ | *[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/7711486/Wikipedia-porn-row-sees-founder-give-up-his-editing-privileges.html Wikipedia-porn-row-sees-founder-give-up-his-editing-privileges] Daily Telegraph 11 May | ||
+ | *[http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1635810/wikipedia-roiled-porn-row Wikipedia roiled by porn row] The Inquirer 11 May | ||
==Wales' purge== | ==Wales' purge== |
Revision as of 16:15, 11 May 2010
News coverage
- Wikipedia purges porn Fox news 7 May
- Wikimedia dumps porn following FoxNews probe Silicon Republic 10 May
- Wikipedia-porn-row-sees-founder-give-up-his-editing-privileges Daily Telegraph 11 May
- Wikipedia roiled by porn row The Inquirer 11 May
Wales' purge
Restored material
Material that was always there
Debates on the Commons and Meta-wiki
Wikipedia culture
Evidence that the political culture of Wikipedia is deeply hostile to getting rid of porn.
- Rosenzweig, fatuous comment on Wales' talk page
- David Gerard "These vicious morons"
- Wales' talk page at commons
- Wales' talk page at en:Wkipedia
- Pro-pedo POV pushers
- pro-bestiality POV pushers
- Sexualised images of children and the Wikipedia mascot
- Paid shills for the porn industry
- Pedophiles can be productive editors
- "The censorship of centuries-old art is a very frightening event" a Wikipedia editor speaks to the press.
- Pedophiles are welcome
- Hand wringing over whether they should be welcome
- Should 6 year olds be allowed to edit?