Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikipedia scandals"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 15, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search (Fuzzy Zoeller incident) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Arg! I didn't even include the February 22nd revelation that Fuzzy Zoeller was bringing a lawsuit against an editor who libeled Zoeller in Wikipedia. Maybe I can update the page at some point, and extend the financial pattern backwards a couple of weeks, to include the Microsoft blogger incident, too. For now, though, I think the graphic speaks volumes. --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 08:57, 19 March 2007 (PDT) | Arg! I didn't even include the February 22nd revelation that Fuzzy Zoeller was bringing a lawsuit against an editor who libeled Zoeller in Wikipedia. Maybe I can update the page at some point, and extend the financial pattern backwards a couple of weeks, to include the Microsoft blogger incident, too. For now, though, I think the graphic speaks volumes. --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 08:57, 19 March 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | This would be a lot more convincing if you pushed the starting date back a month. For all we can tell, the first day just happened to coincide with a major donation and was a spike. [[User:Jayzel|Jayzel]] 00:46, 21 March 2007 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 07:46, 21 March 2007
That's a great chart! It would be cool if a major media property elected to use it.
Fuzzy Zoeller incident
Arg! I didn't even include the February 22nd revelation that Fuzzy Zoeller was bringing a lawsuit against an editor who libeled Zoeller in Wikipedia. Maybe I can update the page at some point, and extend the financial pattern backwards a couple of weeks, to include the Microsoft blogger incident, too. For now, though, I think the graphic speaks volumes. --MyWikiBiz 08:57, 19 March 2007 (PDT)
This would be a lot more convincing if you pushed the starting date back a month. For all we can tell, the first day just happened to coincide with a major donation and was a spike. Jayzel 00:46, 21 March 2007 (PDT)
