User talk:MyWikiBiz

Past discussions are archived here:

• Archive 1 (Oct 2006 - Mar 2007)
• Archive 2 (Mar 2007 - May 2007)
• Archive 3 (June 2007 - June 2008)
• Archive 4 (July 2008 - January 2009)
• Archive 5 (January 2009 - December 2009)

Aricle not doing well in google

this article Sarey Savy is number 15 on google i need to make it number one! Help! please?! (Michael Chen 21:06, 11 February 2010 (PST))

You just created it. It may take some time to get to #1. Also, it will help if you go to other websites (Facebook, MySpace, Wikia, etc.) and try to get an external link placed FROM there TO this article here. I will look at the Sarey Savy page and see if I can help matters with the semantic tagging in the article. -- MyWikiBiz 06:00, 12 February 2010 (PST)

Thanks man this is WAY better than Wikipedia =] If i could give away awards for best wikis i would give you millions and you'd win all the time =] (Michael Chen 08:42, 12 February 2010 (PST))

Oh it's decreasing it's rank on google. (Michael Chen 09:08, 12 February 2010 (PST))

Why is it decreasing? (Michael Chen 09:47, 12 February 2010 (PST))

It probably senses your panic. Seriously, calm down -- these things take time. And there's no saying that this page is going to go to #1 -- there's already a page on MySpace and on Facebook. They tend to perform stronger than MyWikiBiz. Have you set up any inbound, "dofollow" links on other sites? -- MyWikiBiz 12:52, 12 February 2010 (PST)

Yes it is linked on myspace facebook etc. (Michael Chen 14:03, 12 February 2010 (PST))

What can i do to improve the google ranking? (Michael Chen 21:40, 12 February 2010 (PST))

Mr. Chen, may I ask how old are you? Please read this and follow what you learn there. These are basic tips for boosting the Google ranking of a site or page you wish to optimize. Good luck! -- MyWikiBiz 06:51, 13 February 2010 (PST)

Thanks! It's number 3 on google ranking! Can't you take the Directory talk out? (Michael Chen 10:37, 13 February 2010 (PST))

Okay it fell down it's not even on google!!! I just deleted my history and everything then the next thing you know Sarey Savy-Mywikibiz is GONE! (Michael Chen 16:01, 14 February 2010 (PST))

The directory doesn't show up but, yet when i take the directory out it does at number 3. (Michael Chen 09:39, 15 February 2010 (PST))

Problems With SVG Images

Hi, Greg, there's some kind of problem with SVG images. Maybe we're a couple of MediaWiki updates behind?

• Here's my test page: http://mywikibiz.com/User:Jon_Awbrey/SVG

• Here's what it should look like: http://oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey/SVG

Jon Awbrey 10:50, 16 February 2010 (PST)

We will look into it and seek a repair. -- MyWikiBiz 13:42, 16 February 2010 (PST)

Can you please explain to me what your site is for?

I don't want to break any rules here. I really don't want to be banned from here. They banned me at wikipedia review and it just hurt my feelings even more. I would like to help out here, but I don't want any more bans because it makes me feel bad. I guess I have a very big problem with following or understanding site rules, so if you could please help me out with what you expect here and what this is for - before I do anything wrong and get banned I would appreciate it.Wiki Greek Basketball 12:45, 19 February 2010 (PST)

This page should answer most of your questions. I'm happy that you're here. Not looking to ban you. In fact, three of the four top contributors to MyWikiBiz.com are blocked on Wikipedia. You basically have a lot of options here, but the first thing you need to square away is whether you are going to try to make a little bit of money here (more effort and slightly more rules to obey), or whether money is not of interest to you (easier, and fewer rules to stay on top of). -- MyWikiBiz 17:10, 19 February 2010 (PST)

Wikia

Do you suppose Wikia would be profitable by now, or ever if Wikipedia did not tag Wikia links with the "nofollow" tag for however long? Do you know for how long they were not tagged with "nofollow"?

I saw that you posted this link, I think on WR:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LinkSearch&limit=5000&offset=20000&target=http://*.wikia.com

So there are like 22,000 Wikia links? Wow. Wikademia

Considering that Wikia is only barely profitable at this time (and with $14 million sunk into it, and likely very little of that recuperated), I would honestly suggest that Wikia would not be profitable by now if they hadn't had the early and ongoing boost(s) from Wikipedia-based link relevance and traffic. If you add to this how often Jimmy Wales has traveled on purportedly a Wikimedia Foundation "mission", but manages to talk about Wikia even briefly to large audiences, then I am absolutely certain Wikia would be well underwater without that self-promotional boost. -- MyWikiBiz 09:18, 18 March 2010 (PDT)

But it is probably legal to do things like that I suppose? I am not a lawyer. I have no idea. Wikademia

Oh, I'm sure it's legal... up until the point the IRS decides to conduct an audit of either your personal or your corporation's taxes. But, regardless; the real point is when you consider how Wales speaks so glowingly of his free (and freewill) contributions to the Wikimedia Foundation mission (with no mention of how he's appropriated that mission to almost entirely drive his personal fortunes), his character is revealed to be that of a hypocrite when he speaks with revulsion about those who would "exploit" Wikipedia for profit. You're smart enough to see through that phony baloney, right? -- MyWikiBiz 14:15, 18 March 2010 (PDT)

Self deception maybe? Or maybe just the way capitalism has to work? Wikademia

Wikademia and Wikieducator

I'm sure you'd be welcome to edit on both of those. Wikademia

Have you seen the Alexa ratings of WikiEducator? They are a bit lower than MyWikiBiz. I'd reach more people working here. As for Wikademia, let me know when it reaches the top million on Alexa. -- MyWikiBiz 21:50, 21 March 2010 (PDT)

Hi MyWikiBiz

I would like to edit the article 'Greg James Sculpture Studio Gallery' but it appears to be locked. The article was created by Peter Z. who doesn't seem to have any problems in editing it. My menu bar displays on the article 'View Source'. Can you please help? Greg James Sculpture 21:11, 31 March 2010 (PDT)

It is open now to your being able to edit it. However, be advised, once you make an edit, you will become the "owner" of the article (because it's in Directory space), and others (including Peter) will not have access to edit. That's how our Directory space is set up at MyWikiBiz -- it's intended to be one-editor-only. If the two of you are both equally interested in editing it, I would suggest creating a joint account between you and share the password. -- MyWikiBiz 21:30, 31 March 2010 (PDT)

Thank you Greg James Sculpture 21:47, 31 March 2010 (PDT)

Title Help

Hi MyWikiBiz! Could you please help me. I've created a new article & left a dot at the end of the title: Directory:Robert Dawkins-The Silver Gallery. Is their a way of removing the dot, because I can't figure out how to do it? Regards:) Peter Z. 19:34, 7 April 2010 (PDT)

I have moved it to a new location, sans period. -- MyWikiBiz 04:55, 8 April 2010 (PDT)

Thanks. Peter Z. 05:38, 8 April 2010 (PDT)

Help:SMW

There is a note on one of my pages which says that ASK is no longer supported but to use 'SMW'. Is there any documentation on this pls? (Couldn't find any). Ockham 19:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Does this have anything to do with it? If I can figure this out I will add some help files. Ockham 19:52, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes, that is exactly the page I was going to point you to, Ockham. This was one of the most frustrating aspects of our transfer to a new server host and a complete upgrade/update to both the most current Mediawiki core software, but also the most current Semantic Mediawiki extension that used to run all of our Attributes and Relations. Now, both Attributes and Relations are lumped into a new field called "Properties". And instead of using a := for Attributes, all Properties now need a :: instruction. I'm going to be hiring a coder to try to make some of these universal, global changes to try to make things a bit more polished around here. -- MyWikiBiz 02:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi thanks. I tested the medieval philosophers query with the SMW syntax but still doesn't work. I think it needs a professional to set us on the right road and then we can take it from there. Ockham 07:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

[edit] ah my mistake. It does work (see this version of the page). Ockham 07:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC) {edit] The key is to remember that it doesn't support the '=<' sign. '<' in SMW means 'less or equal to'. Otherwise you get the bug. Ockham 07:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

How about this

I think SMW is going to be more powerful than ASK. I have created a new version of List_of_Scholastic_Texts, which as you can see now supports links to the authors, which the old version never did.

I am going to experiment with catalogues of medieval manuscripts. I have a digitised version of M.R.James catologue of manuscripts held in Gonville and Caius' library. This has details of condition, production date or century, lists of Authors and so on. There are currently projects to take catalogues like these and use professional software developers in the old-fahshioned and expensive way, to build large and difficult-to-maintain databases that only professional developers (rather than users) can understand. Using environments like this, you hardly need developers. A team of users and experts working together can quickly build a database that is far easier to use and far more transparent than any expensive database developed in the traditional IT-led way.

The problem is to get the users (i.e. medievalists or whoever) to understand how powerful this can be, and how easy to use. I will make some experiments with the James catalogue and if this works I will publish something in 'Digital Medievalist'. Ockham 08:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

I agree that while this was a painful upgrade, the opportunities for even better uses of the Semantic architecture are worth it. I am very, very pleased (you don't know how much) that a "regular user" figured this out and will be setting an example for others. I'm going to be hiring the coder later today or tomorrow, and I hope that he'll do quite a lot to help "clean up" the old messes left behind by the upgrade. -- MyWikiBiz 16:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, it's no problem. I also succeeded in setting up List_of_medieval_manuscripts as mentioned above. This points to pages like Directory:Logic_Museum/Caius_344/540 which are a much better way of structuring information than in the old Directory:Logic_Museum/Manuscripts, which is the old Wikipedia-style of hard-coding a list of things that cannot be sorted or filtered or categorised. If I have time I will write a little 1-2-3 tutorial that will take someone used to the old ways and show them the new way. Ockham 17:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Access to The_Wikipedia_Point_of_View

Hi Greg I have lost edit rights to The_Wikipedia_Point_of_View. I can edit subdirectories of it, and other directories I own, but not this. Oddly, Peter Z seems able to edit it. How strange. I was going to start a subdirectory on terrible economics articles. Ockham 17:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)