Difference between revisions of "Directory talk:IBM"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday December 27, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Format of the Infobox)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
Notice that the Revenue looks nice (with United States dollar referencing), but that Operating Income and Net Income don't seem to look as "clean".  If this is something that could/should be cleaned up, better that we do it now, and not after dozens of Corporate Infoboxes are in place. --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 13:08, 15 November 2006 (PST)
 
Notice that the Revenue looks nice (with United States dollar referencing), but that Operating Income and Net Income don't seem to look as "clean".  If this is something that could/should be cleaned up, better that we do it now, and not after dozens of Corporate Infoboxes are in place. --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 13:08, 15 November 2006 (PST)
 +
 +
: Do you mean because they aren't wiki-linked in blue? Or that it should appear as $US12.4 billion ($ placed in front). If it's because it's not wiki-linked, I just thought a good convention would be to link once on the first reference. --[[User:Centiare|Centiare]] 13:50, 15 November 2006 (PST)

Revision as of 21:50, 15 November 2006

IBM corporate governance, shareholder activism, government regulation & oversight

TestingKarl Nagel 21:18, 2 November 2006 (PST)

Format of the Infobox

Karl, I'm wondering about the formatting right here:

revenue    = US$91.1 billion (2005)[1] |
operating_income = US$12.4 billion (2005)[1]
(10.5% operating margin[2])| net_income = US$7.9 billion (2005)[1]
(9.3% profit margin[2])

Notice that the Revenue looks nice (with United States dollar referencing), but that Operating Income and Net Income don't seem to look as "clean". If this is something that could/should be cleaned up, better that we do it now, and not after dozens of Corporate Infoboxes are in place. --MyWikiBiz 13:08, 15 November 2006 (PST)

Do you mean because they aren't wiki-linked in blue? Or that it should appear as $US12.4 billion ($ placed in front). If it's because it's not wiki-linked, I just thought a good convention would be to link once on the first reference. --Centiare 13:50, 15 November 2006 (PST)
  1. ^ a b c <templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>"IBM Stock Report". Morningstar, Inc. Retrieved 2006-06-27.
  2. ^ a b <templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>"IBM: Company Overview". Reuters. Retrieved 2006-06-27.