Difference between revisions of "User talk:Boxstuf"
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
I've implemented a 3-day block for you to judge whether it's worth the effort on this site to keep trying to defame a real person with your unsubstantiated claims that they are a "spy". Every subsequent block (if necessary -- it's really up to you!) will be longer and longer. I hope you can learn to find the line between just regular ranting and defamatory ranting. Thank you! - [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] ([[User talk:MyWikiBiz|talk]]) 03:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC) | I've implemented a 3-day block for you to judge whether it's worth the effort on this site to keep trying to defame a real person with your unsubstantiated claims that they are a "spy". Every subsequent block (if necessary -- it's really up to you!) will be longer and longer. I hope you can learn to find the line between just regular ranting and defamatory ranting. Thank you! - [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] ([[User talk:MyWikiBiz|talk]]) 03:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | : BOXSTUF DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG THIS TIME, WHATS YOUR PROBLEM? NOBODY DEFAMED ANYBODY AND WHY DO YOU RUDELY DELETED HIS COMMENTS? | + | : BOXSTUF DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG THIS TIME, WHATS YOUR PROBLEM? NOBODY DEFAMED ANYBODY AND WHY DO YOU SO RUDELY DELETED HIS COMMENTS? |
IF YOU CANT RESPECT OUR WORK, THEN WE DONT NEED TO EDIT! WE WOULDNT CARE A BIT! | IF YOU CANT RESPECT OUR WORK, THEN WE DONT NEED TO EDIT! WE WOULDNT CARE A BIT! | ||
THANX TO US U ALSO GOT AT LEAST DOZEN NEW USERS!@! U SHOULD BE GRATEFUL WE ARE HELPING U BUT U NEVER R! | THANX TO US U ALSO GOT AT LEAST DOZEN NEW USERS!@! U SHOULD BE GRATEFUL WE ARE HELPING U BUT U NEVER R! | ||
Revision as of 01:15, 2 May 2014
mywikibiz.com/Eddie_Nichols THIS & ALL ELSE R MY ORIGINAL ARTICLES, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY!!!
- ROCKY MARCIANO VS BOB BAKER TRUE STORY! BAKER WAS IN HIS PRIME IN 1956 ROCKY KNEW IT!
- SUCH VALUABLE INFO AS USUAL WILL BE DELETED ON WIKIPEEDIA AKA WIKIPEDOIA BY shameful disgraced lowly WIKIDIOTS!
as wiki-watch.com wiki-watch.de say so bookmark all great sites all R true!LOLS!
- SAME GOES FOR BOXREC.COM boxrecIDIOTS boxrecPEDOS, boxrecFOOS, DONT BUY ANYTHIN THERE, ALL ARE STOLEN GOODS!
lols LOLS!!!
Boxing has too many weight categories, original were 8, I'd only add super middleweight + cruisereweight. Ten weight categories are sufficient. There are at least 5 unnecesary dif 2greedy boxing organziation, multiply 17 divisions x 5, you get 85 champions at least, who the hell has time or willing to remember em, they are mostly pretenders; there must always be one lineal (most important, cuz he beat da man who beat da man), universally accepted champ, that's y boxing deserves big 0 respect!
Self-control
Please try to rein yourself in a bit, as I've tried to help here. I cannot allow MyWikiBiz.com to be used to publish potentially libelous material that is not documented and substantive. Thank you! - MyWikiBiz (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
You don't seem to be acknowledging my gentle message. If you continue in this vein, I will suspend your User account for a period of time, to help you understand that I own this site, and that you are using this site at my discretion. Thank you! - MyWikiBiz (talk) 17:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
I've implemented a 3-day block for you to judge whether it's worth the effort on this site to keep trying to defame a real person with your unsubstantiated claims that they are a "spy". Every subsequent block (if necessary -- it's really up to you!) will be longer and longer. I hope you can learn to find the line between just regular ranting and defamatory ranting. Thank you! - MyWikiBiz (talk) 03:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- BOXSTUF DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG THIS TIME, WHATS YOUR PROBLEM? NOBODY DEFAMED ANYBODY AND WHY DO YOU SO RUDELY DELETED HIS COMMENTS?
IF YOU CANT RESPECT OUR WORK, THEN WE DONT NEED TO EDIT! WE WOULDNT CARE A BIT! THANX TO US U ALSO GOT AT LEAST DOZEN NEW USERS!@! U SHOULD BE GRATEFUL WE ARE HELPING U BUT U NEVER R!
