Difference between revisions of "File:Halfaker13making-preprint.pdf"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 11, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchBadmachine (talk | contribs) (fix) |
Badmachine (talk | contribs) (restore text (possibly from that bug a few months ago)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <pre> | |
| + | Making Peripheral Participation Legitimate: Reader Engagement Experiments in Wikipedia | ||
| − | + | Aaron Halfaker, Oliver Keyes, Dario Taraborelli | |
| − | |||
| − | + | ABSTRACT Open collaboration communities thrive when participation isplentiful. Recent research has shown that the English Wik-ipedia community has constructed a vast and accurate infor-mation resource primarily through the monumental effort of arelatively small number of active, volunteer editors. BeyondWikipedia’s active editor community is a substantially largerpool of potential participants: readers. In this paper we de-scribe a set of field experiments using the Article FeedbackTool, a system designed to elicit lightweight contributionsfrom Wikipedia’s readers. Through the lens of social learningtheory and comparisons to related work in open bug trackingsoftware, we evaluate the costs and benefits of the expandedparticipation model and show both qualitatively and quanti-tatively that peripheral contributors add value to an open col-laboration community as long as the cost of identifying lowquality contributions remains low. | |
| − | + | </pre> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | * http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~halfak/publications/Making_Peripheral_Participation_Legitimate/halfaker13making-preprint.pdf | |
| − | + | Keywords: Article Feedback Tool, AFT5, WMF failed software extensions, Flow, Vector skin, Echo, VisualEditor, Flow, Media Viewer, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 21:43, 5 October 2015
Making Peripheral Participation Legitimate: Reader Engagement Experiments in Wikipedia Aaron Halfaker, Oliver Keyes, Dario Taraborelli ABSTRACT Open collaboration communities thrive when participation isplentiful. Recent research has shown that the English Wik-ipedia community has constructed a vast and accurate infor-mation resource primarily through the monumental effort of arelatively small number of active, volunteer editors. BeyondWikipedia’s active editor community is a substantially largerpool of potential participants: readers. In this paper we de-scribe a set of field experiments using the Article FeedbackTool, a system designed to elicit lightweight contributionsfrom Wikipedia’s readers. Through the lens of social learningtheory and comparisons to related work in open bug trackingsoftware, we evaluate the costs and benefits of the expandedparticipation model and show both qualitatively and quanti-tatively that peripheral contributors add value to an open col-laboration community as long as the cost of identifying lowquality contributions remains low.
Keywords: Article Feedback Tool, AFT5, WMF failed software extensions, Flow, Vector skin, Echo, VisualEditor, Flow, Media Viewer, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 13:44, 17 July 2014 | (1.05 MB) | Badmachine (talk | contribs) | <pre> Making Peripheral Participation Legitimate: Reader Engagement Experiments in Wikipedia Aaron Halfaker, Oliver Keyes, Dario Taraborelli ABSTRACT Open collaboration communities thrive when participation isplentiful. Recent research has shown that... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
There are no pages that use this file.
