Sexism and Wikipedia
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday November 14, 2024
Revision as of 17:00, 28 March 2011 by MyWikiBiz (talk | contribs) (moved Sexism to Sexism and Wikipedia: Topic more specific.)
- Define Gender Gap? Look Up Wikipedia’s Contributor List Noam Cohen January 30, 2011
- "After seeing the short entry on Ms. Barker, Ms. Gardner added a substantial amount of background."
- Women on Wikipedia Kat Walsh 07:17, 31 January 2011
- "[...] the focus should be on becoming more open and diverse in general--becoming more inclusive to everyone, which will naturally bring in more women. (I don't think of the "Wikipedia community" as a monolith--it's more like hundreds of different communities some of which overlap with each other just enough. I cringe whenever I hear "Wikipedia doesn't think this is notable" or "Wikipedia decided to change" for a decision that was probably made by four or five people which no one else even knew about; unless it's really one of the rare occasions where some big decision is made and there is a huge effort to inform everyone, most everything is only seen by a very small group of people.) [...] Being more inclusive means having access to the knowledge and skills of people whose input is not already widely available, and to share it with people who weren't aware of it before. And we, unlike many sources using a more traditional model, do have the capability to do that; we're not fulfilling our mission if we don't."
- Where are the women in Wikipedia? February 2, 2011
- A difference of communication styles Susan C. Herring February 4, 2011, 03:07 PM
- "Wikipedia [...] is a site where discourse is not infrequently contentious. On ‘talk’ pages, where the process of article creation is hashed out, one’s contributions are often challenged, and some contributors, anonymous and otherwise, use rude and haranguing language. Such environments are — if not outright intimidating — unappealing to many women."
- 'Open' doesn't include everyone Joseph M. Reagle February 4, 2011, 03:07 PM
- "[...] the openness of such communities means that a minority of high-conflict members (including, for example, a misogynist or an Internet troll) can have a disproportionate effect on the tone and dynamics of the community."
- Editing wars behind the scenes Justine Cassell February 4, 2011, 03:07 PM
- "[...] this gender imbalance raises the possibility that “citizen-generated media” are not actually generated by all citizens, and that the democracy that Wikipedia aspires to may in fact ignore the voices of 50 percent of the population. This is indeed something to worry about."
- Trolls and other nuisances Terri Oda February 4, 2011, 03:07 PM
- "Unfortunately, many discussion sites suffer from the tyranny of trolls who actively hinder women’s participation by trying to derail discussions, make contributions significantly more time-consuming, or send inappropriate or even violent private messages to contributors. I have no idea why they do this, but it seems to happen to many online communities so I presume there’s some subset of folk who think it's fun to drive away contributors."
- The antisocial factor Anna North February 4, 2011, 03:07 PM
- "One solution to this would be to make Wikipedia a more social place, but I’d also like to see both intellectualism and introversion become more acceptable for women too. Female nerd culture has made big strides in the last decade, and women have infiltrated many once-male online domains – but we still have a ways to go, and making Wikipedia more equal would be a big step in the right direction."
- More about power than gender Jessamyn West February 4, 2011, 03:07 PM
- "If altering the gender balance matters, then we have to not just promote this idea, but be prepared to enforce social norms of equity and diversity -- not just wait for a beautiful future where balance somehow exists -- and we have to learn to deal gracefully with the backlash. It is a discussion more about power than gender."
- Hearing Women's Voices Jane Margolis February 4, 2011, 12:56 PM
- "[...] why do these low numbers even matter? I believe the answer is two-fold: It matters for the individuals who want to participate, but are made to feel unwelcomed along the way. And, it matters for the larger society that needs women’s full participation."
- A difference of communication styles Susan C. Herring February 4, 2011, 03:07 PM
- Wikipedia biographies favor men Gregory Kohs January 12th, 2011 11:28 pm ET
- "Approximately 81% of the Wikipedia articles about living people are about males."